Bribery vs. Quid Pro Quo and Extortion: Understanding the Differences

If you’ve been following politics, local news, or social media, you might have encountered terms like bribery, quid pro quo (QPQ), and extortion. It’s natural to feel uncertain about the distinctions between these terms. In this article, we’ll explore the similarities and main differences between them in a clear and straightforward manner.

What Sets Apart Bribery, Quid Pro Quo, and Extortion?

Let’s start with Quid Pro Quo. This term describes an agreement where two or more parties engage in a reciprocal exchange of goods and services. While some quid pro quos involve illegal activities like bribery and extortion, not all of them do.

In the context of bribery, a quid pro quo occurs when someone with a public or official obligation offers, provides, requests, or receives anything of value to influence someone’s actions.

On the other hand, extortion takes place when someone threatens to harm another person, be it physically, in terms of reputation, or property damage, among other possibilities.

While quid pro quo is essential to the concepts of bribery and extortion, not all exchanges of value are corrupt practices.

Understanding Bribery

Bribery is a white-collar crime that involves offering, asking for, giving, or receiving anything of value (such as money, presents, meals, or valuable assets) to influence someone with a public or legal obligation.

The federal statute that prohibits bribery, 18 U.S. Code Section 201, contains three main parts:

  1. Offering or promising something of value to a public official.
  2. With the intent to induce that official to take or refrain from taking official action.
  3. With the intent to induce that official to commit or allow fraud, or to do or refrain from doing something contrary to their duty.
See also  Quid pro quo social engineering: Understanding the Risks and Prevention

If the bribes are instigated or solicited by a public official, that official may also face criminal charges. Additionally, giving or receiving anything of value to compel false testimony before Congress or a hearing is illegal.

Unlike other forms of corruption, bribery has far-reaching consequences beyond those directly involved. The maximum penalty is 15 years in prison or three times the sum involved, as well as a lifetime ban from holding any office of honor, trust, or profit under the United States.

Bribery and Corruption Toolkit
Image Source: Bribery and Corruption Toolkit by Practical Law

The Nature of Extortion

Similar to bribery, extortion is a serious white-collar crime. It occurs when someone uses threats, pressure, or intimidation to obtain money, goods, or services. In cases of blackmail, the victim is not in immediate danger but fears being exposed. Extortion can also involve making someone the subject of an investigation or putting them in the public eye due to other activities. People from various walks of life can be targeted.

In the Supreme Court case Evans v. United States, it was established that extortion is a crime under common law when a public official accepts payment to avoid carrying out their official duties. Punishment for this federal offense can include up to one year in federal prison, a fine, or both.

United States Government officials or employees attempting to extort less than $1,000 can face up to one year in jail. If the amount exceeds $1,000, the punishment may be up to three years in prison along with fines (18 U.S.C. 872). Harsher penalties exist for other forms of blackmail, such as violations of The Hobbs Act, which can lead to a maximum sentence of 20 years in prison.

See also  5 Ways CFOs Can Improve Law Firm Cash Flow and Expedite Payments

Unpacking Quid Pro Quo

Quid pro quo arrangements are often associated with workplace harassment, job discrimination, or discrimination in educational institutions. In the context of sexual harassment, a manager might offer a subordinate a raise, better hours, a promotion, or protection against pay cuts or demotion in exchange for sexual favors. Workplace harassment occurs when an employee faces threats after refusing their boss’s demands.

Surprisingly, the majority of U.S. occupations are “at-will” positions, meaning employers can terminate employees for any reason except illegal discrimination. Employers cannot take adverse employment action against employees or potential employees based on protected traits, such as firing, refusing to hire, demoting, or promoting. Employees facing workplace harassment due to quid pro quo arrangements can sue for discrimination. In education, quid pro quo harassment involves students assisting teachers to improve their grades.

Bribery vs. Quid Pro Quo: The Nuances

Quid pro quo is always present in bribes, but not all quid pro quo arrangements qualify as bribery. For example, when you exchange money for an item at a store, you are engaging in a legal “good faith” exchange. You are not giving a gift to the salesperson; you are simply making a purchase. This type of quid pro quo does not involve bribery.

However, when a trade is based on ill motives and has negative effects, it violates the quid pro quo principle and can be considered bribery. For instance, if a supplier offers a bonus to a company’s procurement manager in exchange for ensuring the supplier receives a kickback in cash or valuable items, this quid pro quo arrangement is called bribery because it harms the company and hinders other businesses from competing.

See also  Copyright Litigation: A Comprehensive Guide

Extortion vs. Quid Pro Quo: Understanding the Distinction

Every charge of bribery or extortion requires a quid pro quo element. However, not all quid pro quo deals are illegal and involve bribery or extortion.

Extortion is a criminal act that involves a specific quid pro quo, where one party presents a negative outcome as unavoidable unless the second party takes a certain action.

Unraveling the Complexity

By definition, quid pro quo is neither immoral nor illegal. However, it often carries illegal and immoral implications when tied to bribery and extortion.

To summarize:

  • In bribery, illegal quid pro quo occurs when one party, often a government official, offers something of value in exchange for a favor.
  • Extortion involves illegal quid pro quo, where one party threatens bodily harm, reputation damage, property damage, etc., against another party unless the second party complies with the first party’s request.
  • Both bribery and extortion exemplify quid pro quo, with at least one party acting dishonestly and illegally. When this line is crossed, it becomes a crime. However, discerning whether legal action is warranted or if the actions are merely distasteful or immoral can be challenging in many cases.

If you are facing criminal charges, seeking legal advice can be beneficial. Doing so will help you better understand the situation and define the legal boundaries of quid pro quo within your specific circumstances.

Practical Law
Image Source: Practical Law

Please note that the information provided in this article is not intended as legal advice and should not be relied upon as such. It is general in nature and may not cover all recent legal developments. This article is not provided by a law firm, and using this website does not establish an attorney-client relationship. Before taking any action, consult with qualified legal counsel to ensure you make informed decisions.

Garrity Traina